@wagmiAlexander

We designed MetaDEX03 to internalize and distribute more value for operators and LPs -- up to 3.9x more! A report from Gauntlet funded by Uniswap explains why: anything that reduces the value to LPs creates a negative feedback loop. Maximum value distribution is the only moat.

Never in my life did I believe, that on the eve of one the biggest days of my life — that of the everyone at @DromosLabs — that we could ever be so lucky as to be gifted, by our biggest rival, a mistake of this magnitude. Hope you tune in Wednesday. 🛫

You've got to love $UNI holders being asked to eat $16.5m in sell pressure to pay the Foundation's taxes. And this is on top of the $200M from March? Brutal. Uniswap being "sustainable" has to be one of the most damaging myths ever perpetuated in this space.

Rumors swirling once again that Uniswap is going to propose cutting LP rewards (aka fee switch). No doubt the exit pump will be glorious — but we’ll welcome their LPs will open arms. If you love MetaDEX dom at Uni LPs getting 100%, you’ll love it even more at less. 🫡

If Uniswap was remotely serious, heads would roll. Instead, they're dumping DAO $UNI for pink lifestyle shit while hemorrhaging marketshare year after year. We need someone actually focused on building sustainable EVM exchange rails imo. 🤷‍♂️